F Fenix Guest Joined Sep 2, 2016 Messages 30 Jun 1, 2017 Thread Author #1 https://sfbay.craigslist.org/nby/zip/6157607393.html So big!
S sfsuphysics Supporting Member Joined Nov 7, 2005 Messages 17,384 Jun 1, 2017 #2 Ooh, I'd take that. Of course I would do the sacrilegious thing and chop it up to make a series of smaller reactors.
Ooh, I'd take that. Of course I would do the sacrilegious thing and chop it up to make a series of smaller reactors.
rygh Supporting Member Joined Jun 29, 2010 Messages 7,114 Jun 1, 2017 #4 I wonder if it would work for a tiny kelp forest aquarium...
Flagg37 Guest Joined Nov 29, 2015 Messages 5,041 Jun 1, 2017 #5 roostertech said: View attachment 7131 Click to expand... I see you rethought your last choice in images.
roostertech said: View attachment 7131 Click to expand... I see you rethought your last choice in images.
roostertech Guest Joined Mar 22, 2016 Messages 1,482 Jun 1, 2017 #6 Flagg37 said: I see you rethought your last choice in images. Click to expand... The first choice more accurately describe my reaction. The second one convey the reaction better w/o the distraction.
Flagg37 said: I see you rethought your last choice in images. Click to expand... The first choice more accurately describe my reaction. The second one convey the reaction better w/o the distraction.